Batting avg |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
.311 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
.280 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
.250 |
|
4. |
DSS |
.250 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
.245 |
|
|
Slugging pct |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
.421 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
.390 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
.339 |
|
4. |
DSS |
.318 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
.309 |
|
|
On base pct |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
.390 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
.371 |
|
3. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
.340 |
|
4. |
DSS |
.333 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
.330 |
|
|
Runs scored |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
291 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
259 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
209 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
184 |
|
|
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
184 |
|
|
Hits |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
451 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
403 |
|
3. |
DSS |
351 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
345 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
338 |
|
|
Runs batted in |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
259 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
227 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
190 |
|
4. |
DSS |
152 |
|
5. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
150 |
|
|
Doubles |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
76 |
|
2. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
69 |
|
3. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
64 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
56 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
46 |
|
|
Triples |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
18 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
16 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
14 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
13 |
|
5. |
DSS |
10 |
|
|
Home runs |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
18 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
17 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
13 |
|
4. |
DSS |
10 |
|
5. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
8 |
|
|
Total bases |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
610 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
562 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
468 |
|
4. |
DSS |
446 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
425 |
|
|
Total plate appearances |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
1710 |
|
2. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
1674 |
|
3. |
DSS |
1629 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
1618 |
|
5. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
1613 |
|
|
At bats |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
1448 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
1440 |
|
3. |
DSS |
1403 |
|
4. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
1399 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
1379 |
|
|
Walks |
1. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
191 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
183 |
|
3. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
173 |
|
4. |
DSS |
165 |
|
5. |
2 tied at ... |
158 |
|
|
Hit by pitch |
1. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
50 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
41 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
26 |
|
4. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
22 |
|
5. |
2 tied at ... |
20 |
|
|
Strikeouts |
1. |
SILICON STORKS |
362 |
|
2. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
303 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
301 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
291 |
|
5. |
DSS |
280 |
|
|
Sac bunts |
1. |
HCAW |
35 |
|
2. |
DSS |
31 |
|
3. |
SILICON STORKS |
29 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
25 |
|
|
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
25 |
|
|
Sac flies |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
24 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
16 |
|
3. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
15 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
14 |
|
5. |
2 tied at ... |
13 |
|
|
Stolen bases |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
99 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
62 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
61 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
54 |
|
5. |
DSS |
52 |
|
|
Caught stealing |
1. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
26 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
25 |
|
3. |
DSS |
23 |
|
|
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
23 |
|
5. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
20 |
|
|
Steal attempts |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
122 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
87 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
77 |
|
4. |
DSS |
75 |
|
|
HCAW |
75 |
|
|
Grounded into DP |
1. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
31 |
|
|
DSS |
31 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
30 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
28 |
|
|
L&D AMSTERDAM |
28 |
|
|
Earned run avg |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
1.80 |
|
2. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
2.04 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
3.02 |
|
4. |
DSS |
3.69 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
3.87 |
|
|
Opposing bat avg |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
.194 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
.205 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
.232 |
|
4. |
DSS |
.233 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
.239 |
|
|
Innings pitched |
1. |
DSS |
375.1 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
374.1 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
371.0 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
367.1 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
366.2 |
|
|
Batters struck out |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
316 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
292 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
287 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
279 |
|
5. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
273 |
|
|
Batters SO out looking |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
110 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
93 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
86 |
|
4. |
DSS |
82 |
|
5. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
79 |
|
|
Wins |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
37 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
32 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
21 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
18 |
|
5. |
DSS |
17 |
|
|
Losses |
1. |
SILICON STORKS |
37 |
|
2. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
25 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
23 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
21 |
|
5. |
DSS |
20 |
|
|
Saves |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
13 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
9 |
|
|
L&D AMSTERDAM |
9 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
8 |
|
5. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
7 |
|
|
Runners picked off |
1. |
HCAW |
20 |
|
2. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
17 |
|
3. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
13 |
|
4. |
SILICON STORKS |
9 |
|
5. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
7 |
|
|
Sac bunts allowed |
1. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
31 |
|
|
DSS |
31 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
30 |
|
4. |
SILICON STORKS |
28 |
|
5. |
2 tied at ... |
25 |
|
|
Sac flies allowed |
1. |
SILICON STORKS |
25 |
|
2. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
23 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
17 |
|
4. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
14 |
|
5. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
11 |
|
|
Hits allowed |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
249 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
272 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
310 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
323 |
|
5. |
DSS |
330 |
|
|
Runs allowed |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
94 |
|
|
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
94 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
156 |
|
4. |
DSS |
191 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
197 |
|
|
Earned runs allowed |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
75 |
|
2. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
83 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
123 |
|
4. |
DSS |
154 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
158 |
|
|
Walks allowed |
1. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
84 |
|
2. |
HCAW |
122 |
|
3. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
139 |
|
4. |
DSS |
166 |
|
5. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
171 |
|
|
Doubles allowed |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
25 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
33 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
48 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
49 |
|
5. |
DSS |
52 |
|
|
Triples allowed |
1. |
HCAW |
7 |
|
2. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
8 |
|
|
L&D AMSTERDAM |
8 |
|
4. |
SILICON STORKS |
9 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
10 |
|
|
Home runs allowed |
1. |
HCAW |
6 |
|
2. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
7 |
|
|
L&D AMSTERDAM |
7 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
9 |
|
5. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
10 |
|
|
Wild pitches |
1. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
46 |
|
2. |
SILICON STORKS |
41 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
37 |
|
|
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
37 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
27 |
|
|
Balks |
1. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
10 |
|
2. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
9 |
|
3. |
SILICON STORKS |
6 |
|
|
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
6 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
5 |
|
|
Hit batters |
1. |
SILICON STORKS |
42 |
|
2. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
38 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
28 |
|
|
DSS |
28 |
|
5. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
26 |
|
|
Intentional BB allowed |
1. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
16 |
|
2. |
SILICON STORKS |
8 |
|
3. |
DSS |
6 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
5 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
4 |
|
|
Fielding pct |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
.984 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
.982 |
|
3. |
HCAW |
.968 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
.961 |
|
5. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
.957 |
|
|
Chances |
1. |
HCAW |
1681 |
|
2. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
1653 |
|
3. |
DSS |
1638 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
1626 |
|
5. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
1614 |
|
|
Putouts |
1. |
DSS |
1126 |
|
2. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
1123 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
1113 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
1102 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
1100 |
|
|
Assists |
1. |
HCAW |
527 |
|
2. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
469 |
|
3. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
462 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
460 |
|
5. |
DSS |
441 |
|
|
Errors |
1. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
93 |
|
2. |
SILICON STORKS |
91 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
71 |
|
|
DSS |
71 |
|
5. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
64 |
|
|
Fielding double plays |
1. |
CURACAO NEPTUNUS |
51 |
|
2. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
43 |
|
3. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
41 |
|
4. |
HCAW |
37 |
|
5. |
DSS |
33 |
|
|
Stolen bases against |
1. |
SILICON STORKS |
90 |
|
2. |
DSS |
77 |
|
3. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
67 |
|
4. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
57 |
|
|
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
57 |
|
|
Caught stealing by |
1. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
31 |
|
2. |
HCAW |
24 |
|
3. |
SILICON STORKS |
23 |
|
4. |
L&D AMSTERDAM |
19 |
|
5. |
3 tied at ... |
17 |
|
|
Steal attempts against |
1. |
SILICON STORKS |
113 |
|
2. |
DSS |
94 |
|
3. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
88 |
|
4. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
84 |
|
5. |
HCAW |
77 |
|
|
Passed balls |
1. |
DE GLASKONING TWINS |
17 |
|
2. |
HOOFDDORP PIONIERS |
15 |
|
|
HCAW |
15 |
|
4. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
12 |
|
5. |
DSS |
11 |
|
|
Catchers interference |
1. |
QUICK AMERSFOORT |
2 |
|
2. |
SILICON STORKS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|